Academics tell us that Egyptian civilisation began around 3000BC, we are suppose to believe that as if by magic this great civilisation arose from primitive hunter gatherer societies. which produced crude pottery and crude agricultural tools. How could such a revolutionary reorganisation of human society occur in just a few centuries?    It’s like going from the first horseless carriage to a Tesla Roadster with essentially nothing in-between. I want to help make the case in this Series of posts that Egypt may be 10,000's of years older than we have given it credit for, so here goes! ![ShowImage.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmXyd4E6Cqh7yU9bdu7ZktCKTbitH9AJiT1Z67QoeQSCyt/ShowImage.jpeg) **The List of Kings** Acknowledged [Old kingdom Egypt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Kingdom_of_Egypt) is dated at 2700-2200BC in the mainstream narrative. There is unacknowledged and highly controversial evidence for an even older kingdom Egypt. Perhaps dating back tens of thousands of years. Dismissed and often ridiculed by academics today. On many stone tablets and temple walls the ancient Egyptians themselves detail their own early history chronologically. ![AbydosKinglistDrawing.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmRx7btJZPEhUrfWyLx5nzKQbBY9seZLx8LjFCwKeuxYQ1/AbydosKinglistDrawing.png) A Diagram of the Abydos king list, documenting the succession of each pharaoh chronologically. ___ Ancient tablets mention the names of kings and their ruling years. when this is followed back Pharaoh to pharaoh this comes out to something like 36,000 years of continuous rulers. Modern day academics suggest this is only a work of fiction and romance ascribed the their apparent ‘primitive mind.’ Who are we to say that we know the ancients history better than they do? It is the height of ignorance. ___ **The [Giza Necropolis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saqqara) And The Impossible Artifacts Within** Prior to the pyramid age the great necropolis Saqqara was constructed south of Giza. Built by [king Djoser](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djoser) of the 3rd Dynasty around 2,700BC according to a plan devised by [Imhotep](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imhotep) a legendary sage and architect. ![djoserax.jpg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmb9fGmYaiFoyxdw8L2ixf1WguFHvpMQx91o2vKcDR1oyr/djoserax.jpg) ___ Ruins and Full Diagram of the Necropolis ___ ![f89a07a742f7ccf64e1beaa2726dca44.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmbhqWvTzCFhYmLvkMf6hMBrDKbwbNE4jpVmMVZjHXhjqC/f89a07a742f7ccf64e1beaa2726dca44.png) ___ Still an impressive ruin today, it is hard to imagine [Saqqara](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saqqara) in its original pristine glory. An artistic reconstruction shows how Saqqara may have looked at it’s height. If it were built today then we would regard it as a masterpiece of architecture. even Saqqara’s mere existence flies flat in the face of the notion that the Egyptian civilisation was barely emerging from primitivism around this time. ___ **Impossible Artifacts** it’s acknowledged but seldom addressed that Egypt appear to have been in it’s height early in the old kingdom (2613-2181 BC). Nothing produced in Egypt thereafter surpassed and seldom equalled the production quality of the old kingdom architecture and art. An example is this [Porphyry](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diorite#Historic_use) stone vase housed in the Museum of Cairo. Porphyry is a stone with a hardness index higher than that of steel files. It's impact resistant and heat resistant. You can leave it outside for millennia and it will be fine, the only way to break it is to drop it with great force. ![Screen Shot 2017-12-29 at 02.17.55.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmTSF94tDMys8ovHJwFaFJFp4DL9e7YGJgcWykQAShNu7D/Screen%20Shot%202017-12-29%20at%2002.17.55.png) We could not produce these types of vases today. Thin necks and hollowed interiors made out of the hardest of stones. Found by modern day archaeologists alongside items categorised as 1st dynasty or predynastic Egypt such as far less sophisticated pottery and fish hooks, combs and the like, perhaps it is possible that these works of art, again that we could not reproduce today may have been passed down as family heirlooms from before recorded history. They are virtually indestructible, if not smashed then they would certainly last for millennia. [Diorite](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diorite#Historic_use) is an extremely hard rock, making it difficult to carve and work with. How could the ancients create these unbelievable works of art with only access to copper tools, we can work these stones today, only with great difficultly and our highly advanced technology. ![Screen Shot 2017-12-29 at 02.34.18.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmTeqbPGigrkvBTq6j1VhmK8eHmxsbhpzw7eDg6945QKbx/Screen%20Shot%202017-12-29%20at%2002.34.18.png) Look at the statue directly and all you can see is the king, The falcon, representing [Horus](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horus) is not visible. Only when you look at it side on you see the falcon, which represents higher consciousness. This could mean that enlightenment and the integration of higher consciousness is not obvious. On the surface it looks like it’s only the king. But what is really being said is that he has integrated Horus' consciousness into his own. With this forgotten knowledge of stone-working, coupled with advanced metaphysical and abstract thinking being present in old kingdom Egypt we being to realise that ancient Egypt is not as we have been taught, and that this doctrine could not have been developed within a couple of hundred years. It is almost certainly a legacy handed down over generations from that still earlier civilisation that existed prior. ![Screen Shot 2017-12-29 at 02.33.24.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmWAomuTuKFPXTUd5F6s5bhRjp8hxjWiBe4L7RGJZdFwYn/Screen%20Shot%202017-12-29%20at%2002.33.24.png)

___ Hope you enjoyed. Next time I will talk about the Sphinx and how unacknowledged findings may prove that the Sphinx is TEN TIMES older than academia would have us believe! We're just getting started, this should be fun!

eoincurran